Monday, August 4, 2014
Of zionist and isis(I'm not even going to give them the glory of capital letters)
Dear brothers and sisters,regardless of our religion, what zionists army and isis did are totally wrong and disgraceful.i cannot answer for what isis did but know that, what they are doing is not what Islam preached.Islam forbid its followers from starting a war unless it is to defend the honour of Islam and the sovereignty of its state.Still, to follow Islam is to follow its code and ethics;children,women,old people are off limits,churches,synagogue,temples are off limits,people surrendering are off limits,even plants are off limits..that is the code of conduct for a true believer in wartime.what Isis did was wrong,no sane Muslim can justify what they did..pray for peace.what happen in the world now is not crime against religion but crime against humanity,be it in Gaza or Mosul.
Tuesday, November 26, 2013
How I Met Your Mother---Bedtime Stories the best episode yet
For those of you who do know me, they will tell you how much i am obsess with how i met your mother(robin especially). All those stories leading to the final season, when we actually get to see the face of 'the mother'.Call me boring, but i think I'm one of the last few fan who actually still roots for Ted to end up marrying Robin(which was told to us by the producers it would never happen,since season 1), and how I still think that Ted deserves more screen time than Barney. The high and low of the quirky team, their happy and sad moments. but this final season, this particular episode, I get the chance to watch something amazing, the whole episode is in rhyme. Amazing how the writers put in the effort worthy of inclusion into our education system(okay, exaggeration) and the show still does not get the credit it deserves. talk is cheap, and i don't want to waste your time, watch the show, and learn how to rhyme.
Friday, October 18, 2013
Where are we heading with this issue?
The name Allah predates Islam and even Christianity..if they are so afraid that their child would be confused between the teachings in the Quran and the Bible..ask them this.."Have you lost your faith in Allah when He said he will protect the Quran till the day of judgement?" "Have you actually taught the differences in the writing style found in both scriptures?"
To Allah belongs the best of attributes,hence the Asma ul Husna..Islam and Christianity is closer than one might think in which we differ in the issue of the divinity of christ and the holy trinity..however one fine look at the syiah and you would see they are nowhere near Islam..the imams?12 ordinary people seen in a divine light?are you serious?hmmm..okay,have to stop before I irk the so called pekasam..or is it perkasa?i dont even care anymore..a bunch of jokes and bigots..
Thursday, August 29, 2013
Merdeka? whose? Mine is on the 22 of July 1963...and the formation of Malaysia is on 16 of September...so what is 31 of August?
Tanggal 31,
Bulan 8...57,
Merdeka,Merdeka...
A famous line from the Song Tanggal 31 by Allahyarham Sudirman. But the Question is, is it the real fact?
First of all, before anyone start bashing me and accusing me of being unpatriotic, bear in mind that this is my honest opinion based on simple facts backed by history.
Let us continue, 31 of August 1957 has been recognized as the day Malaysia achieved its independence, but is it? First of all, let me get the fact straight. the date is actually the date Malaya gained its independence from British. It is as simple as that, so, when does the other two component that made up Malaysia achieved its independence then?
Sarawak, for all of us who are still oblivious to the fact started to recognize the real date this year, only after 50 years. 22 of July 1963 is when our state Sarawak achieved its independence. Sabah achieved independence at a later date but clearly it is not on the 31 August as we are led to believe.
Another misconception that needs to be rectify is the status of Sabah and Sarawak in Malaysia. First, Sabah and Sarawak never joined Malaysia. We formed Malaysia together with Malaya and Singapore. Secondly, according to the 20/18 points(read my earlier post) Sabah and Sarawak are sovereign nation in the formation of Malaysia with autononomy given to us in the field of religion,education,immigration and some other stuff(seriously,go read the post..hehe..). However, it seems that those points are mere documents now without being given serious consideration whenever the leaders introduce new policies.
I'm not saying this all just because I have something against Malaysia. NO, in fact far from it. I love Malaysia just as much as the next person. It just irritates me when ignorant fools try to argue without knowing their facts. Get your facts straight or get the hell out....
Bulan 8...57,
Merdeka,Merdeka...
A famous line from the Song Tanggal 31 by Allahyarham Sudirman. But the Question is, is it the real fact?
First of all, before anyone start bashing me and accusing me of being unpatriotic, bear in mind that this is my honest opinion based on simple facts backed by history.
Let us continue, 31 of August 1957 has been recognized as the day Malaysia achieved its independence, but is it? First of all, let me get the fact straight. the date is actually the date Malaya gained its independence from British. It is as simple as that, so, when does the other two component that made up Malaysia achieved its independence then?
Sarawak, for all of us who are still oblivious to the fact started to recognize the real date this year, only after 50 years. 22 of July 1963 is when our state Sarawak achieved its independence. Sabah achieved independence at a later date but clearly it is not on the 31 August as we are led to believe.
Another misconception that needs to be rectify is the status of Sabah and Sarawak in Malaysia. First, Sabah and Sarawak never joined Malaysia. We formed Malaysia together with Malaya and Singapore. Secondly, according to the 20/18 points(read my earlier post) Sabah and Sarawak are sovereign nation in the formation of Malaysia with autononomy given to us in the field of religion,education,immigration and some other stuff(seriously,go read the post..hehe..). However, it seems that those points are mere documents now without being given serious consideration whenever the leaders introduce new policies.
I'm not saying this all just because I have something against Malaysia. NO, in fact far from it. I love Malaysia just as much as the next person. It just irritates me when ignorant fools try to argue without knowing their facts. Get your facts straight or get the hell out....
Wednesday, August 28, 2013
Of Shia and Syria (Part 2)
The curios case of Syria and Egypt are actually more related than you might think. As i wrote earlier, President Assad of Syria is an alawite shia while President Morsi of Egypt came from the rank of Muslim Brotherhood or Ikhwanul Muslimin. Naturally, Assad would harbour hatred towards Morsi.
As the Assad regime actively battling the insurgents in his country, there are report that suggested Morsi was ousted as the army feared that they will be ordered to breach the border to help the insurgents in their fight against the Syrian army under Assad command. Try looking up on the internet and you will find that the person responsible for this is actually a follower of shia. It is no secret that there are hundreds of sect of shia in the world with different fundamentals and approach towards their obsession with their imams, however one thing they share is their hatreds towards the ahlul sunnah wal jamaah (ASWJ). The word jamaah, for those who did not know, means group or a whole lot, meaning that the majority of Muslims belong to this particular group,while the others are divided to such groups as shia,wahabi,salafi and tareqat. Now, what this means is that, in a country where the person in power is a shia, they will do whatever they can to get rid of ASWJ, this includes but not limited to political assasination, blackmailing, mass genocide, even to the extent of using chemical weapons.
What some of us don't know is the ties between these shias with their hidden allies, Israel and the United States. Have you ever wondered, why Israel and the United States never attack Iran which they accused of housing WMDs? but launched an all out attack on Iraq which later was declared WMD free?
As the Assad regime actively battling the insurgents in his country, there are report that suggested Morsi was ousted as the army feared that they will be ordered to breach the border to help the insurgents in their fight against the Syrian army under Assad command. Try looking up on the internet and you will find that the person responsible for this is actually a follower of shia. It is no secret that there are hundreds of sect of shia in the world with different fundamentals and approach towards their obsession with their imams, however one thing they share is their hatreds towards the ahlul sunnah wal jamaah (ASWJ). The word jamaah, for those who did not know, means group or a whole lot, meaning that the majority of Muslims belong to this particular group,while the others are divided to such groups as shia,wahabi,salafi and tareqat. Now, what this means is that, in a country where the person in power is a shia, they will do whatever they can to get rid of ASWJ, this includes but not limited to political assasination, blackmailing, mass genocide, even to the extent of using chemical weapons.
What some of us don't know is the ties between these shias with their hidden allies, Israel and the United States. Have you ever wondered, why Israel and the United States never attack Iran which they accused of housing WMDs? but launched an all out attack on Iraq which later was declared WMD free?
Sunday, August 18, 2013
Of Shia and Syria (Part 1)
A friend of mine had requested that I wrote something on the issue of Syria. All the news on violence erupting in Syria. but before we could dive any deeper,it is better for us to understand why this thing happened. But trying to understand the situation in Syria is not as easy as you might think, with over 1000 rebel factions and a regime that is backed by western power brokers make for a very complicated and often confusing case.
Firstly, to clarify, Syria population is mostly Muslim by birth with 74% Sunni while Shia only make up 13% of the whole population(some,including myself however, believed that Shia is another religion not to be associated to Islam). Mr. President himself, Bashar Al-Assad is Shia follower, from the Alawites group. This group features heavily in the administration in Syria explaining the government hatred towards the Muslim brotherhood that is made out of Sunni group.
This part of my writing will deal with the animosity between the Sunni and Shia followers.
A lot of people has been asking me, what is my view on Shia, and I have been saying this everytime, in my opinion, they ARE NOT a sect of Islam. Sunni and Shia diverged at the very core,therefore it is safe to say that Shia is a different religion.
Where Sunni put Allah above everything else, the Shia, in their obsession to the point of extremism in expressing their love to Ali bin Abi Talib gave the title of 'Imam' to Ali and his descendants. These titles are not the same as the title that were attributed to Sunni scholars but are sort of a divine title (which in reality given by the followers,never assumed by the said person, i.e. Ali bin Abi Talib and others).
Shia, according to scholars was founded by Abdullah bin Saba, a jew, a fact denied by Shia followers. the said person was a jew who, converted to Islam but not a true believer or called a munafiq. He(according to western scholar could be more than one person) is also the first to utter ghulat(extremism) and to come up with the idea of the supremacy of Ali above others to the point of being divine. Ali himself tried to execute Abdullah bin Saba but was stopped by Ibnu Abbas and instead exiled him to Madain. From that point however, Shia took off until it become what we know today. Countries such as Iran and Syria are dominated by Shia leaders therefore influencing their stance on other Islamic countries and also Israel.
Iran are the centre of all this. Due to the revolution of Iran and their defiance towards USA, they were once hailed as championing the cause of Islam until recently when their true agenda was unmasked for the whole Islamic world to see.
Fforgive me for my very brief introduction on Shia, for more information on the subject,please do some readings and researches and kindly comment so that we can discuss the topic.
The second part will deal with Syria and what is currently happening there. Assalamualaikum.
Firstly, to clarify, Syria population is mostly Muslim by birth with 74% Sunni while Shia only make up 13% of the whole population(some,including myself however, believed that Shia is another religion not to be associated to Islam). Mr. President himself, Bashar Al-Assad is Shia follower, from the Alawites group. This group features heavily in the administration in Syria explaining the government hatred towards the Muslim brotherhood that is made out of Sunni group.
This part of my writing will deal with the animosity between the Sunni and Shia followers.
A lot of people has been asking me, what is my view on Shia, and I have been saying this everytime, in my opinion, they ARE NOT a sect of Islam. Sunni and Shia diverged at the very core,therefore it is safe to say that Shia is a different religion.
Where Sunni put Allah above everything else, the Shia, in their obsession to the point of extremism in expressing their love to Ali bin Abi Talib gave the title of 'Imam' to Ali and his descendants. These titles are not the same as the title that were attributed to Sunni scholars but are sort of a divine title (which in reality given by the followers,never assumed by the said person, i.e. Ali bin Abi Talib and others).
Shia, according to scholars was founded by Abdullah bin Saba, a jew, a fact denied by Shia followers. the said person was a jew who, converted to Islam but not a true believer or called a munafiq. He(according to western scholar could be more than one person) is also the first to utter ghulat(extremism) and to come up with the idea of the supremacy of Ali above others to the point of being divine. Ali himself tried to execute Abdullah bin Saba but was stopped by Ibnu Abbas and instead exiled him to Madain. From that point however, Shia took off until it become what we know today. Countries such as Iran and Syria are dominated by Shia leaders therefore influencing their stance on other Islamic countries and also Israel.
Iran are the centre of all this. Due to the revolution of Iran and their defiance towards USA, they were once hailed as championing the cause of Islam until recently when their true agenda was unmasked for the whole Islamic world to see.
Fforgive me for my very brief introduction on Shia, for more information on the subject,please do some readings and researches and kindly comment so that we can discuss the topic.
The second part will deal with Syria and what is currently happening there. Assalamualaikum.
Sunday, June 23, 2013
movie review : World War Z
This is actually in my list for movie I must watch along with Oblivion(which I missed due to some unforeseen event) simply because it has Brad Pitt in it.
It starts with a sketchy explanation on what had hit earth. With some sceptics calling all this just a hoax and what not. But then, just as brief as the explanation given, situation turn ugly in and instance. the city was overrun with 'zombies' and the hero saved his family. blablabla. We were then told hat he was actually a former super investigator with the UN and they need his help to find the answer to all this. We jump from the ship to South Korea, to Israel where we learn that no matter how high you built the wall, they will eventually come and get you. (on the side note, if the zombies in the movie ever decide to attack us, I'm guessing the family behind me will be the cause of our death, with all the munching and shouting noney which is chinese but I'm not sure what it meant). You will understand why I said that only after you watch the movie.
However, the movie ends in a cliffhanger, yes they managed to find the solution, but they did not show how this disaster really ends. You just have to make your own conclusion with this one.
I would rate it 4 / 5
It starts with a sketchy explanation on what had hit earth. With some sceptics calling all this just a hoax and what not. But then, just as brief as the explanation given, situation turn ugly in and instance. the city was overrun with 'zombies' and the hero saved his family. blablabla. We were then told hat he was actually a former super investigator with the UN and they need his help to find the answer to all this. We jump from the ship to South Korea, to Israel where we learn that no matter how high you built the wall, they will eventually come and get you. (on the side note, if the zombies in the movie ever decide to attack us, I'm guessing the family behind me will be the cause of our death, with all the munching and shouting noney which is chinese but I'm not sure what it meant). You will understand why I said that only after you watch the movie.
However, the movie ends in a cliffhanger, yes they managed to find the solution, but they did not show how this disaster really ends. You just have to make your own conclusion with this one.
I would rate it 4 / 5
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)